Thyroid (porcine) Coupons & Savings Card – Discount Prices from $1.01
My prescription
Edit
1GM, Thyroid (porcine) (1 Bottle)
Select pharmacy
CVS
$23.40
COUPON PRICE
Walmart
$1.01
COUPON PRICE
Walgreens
$2.00
COUPON PRICEThyroid (porcine) savings card
Show this card to your pharmacistWalmart
$1.01
BIN
ID
PCN
GRP
019876
LH98834593
CHIPPO
LHX
Powered by
Price history for Thyroid (porcine) (generic)
1, 1GM
Average retail price for Thyroid (porcine)
Average SaveHealth price for Thyroid (porcine)
Our price history data is based on aggregated prescription data collected from participating pharmacies in America. Our prescription data updates daily to reflect the latest price changes. If you notice a missing data point, it means there wasn't sufficient data available to generate a monetary value for that date.
We analyzed Thyroid (porcine) prices for (1GM, 1 Bottle) over the last 12 months. The average retail price was $17.13, while the average price using the SaveHealth discount card was $14.29. That's a savings of approximately 16.58% when using our Thyroid (porcine) coupon.
Thyroid (porcine) dosage forms
| Dosage | Quantity | Price from | Per unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1GM | 1 Bottle | $1.01 | $1.01 |
Thyroid (porcine) Side Effects
Is Armour Thyroid bovine or porcine?
Armour Thyroid is derived from porcine (pig) thyroid glands.
What animal is Armour Thyroid made from?
Armour Thyroid is made from the thyroid glands of pigs, also known as porcine thyroid.
What is the controversy with Armour Thyroid?
The controversy surrounding Armour Thyroid primarily involves concerns about its consistency and standardization. Armour Thyroid is a natural desiccated thyroid extract derived from porcine thyroid glands, and some healthcare professionals question its reliability in providing consistent hormone levels compared to synthetic thyroid medications. Additionally, there is debate over whether the combination of T3 and T4 hormones in Armour Thyroid is appropriate for all patients, as some may require different ratios or only T4. The lack of large-scale, long-term studies comparing its efficacy and safety to synthetic alternatives also contributes to the controversy.